Welcome

TECHNEST / Blog

Japan–Vietnam development: align business terms before writing specifications

Familiar words can mean different things across departments. A concise glossary with examples and named reviewers helps Japanese and Vietnamese teams clarify requirements early.

In software outsourcing for Japanese businesses, an accurately translated document does not necessarily give everyone the same understanding. Familiar words such as “customer,” “sales” and “complete” can mean different things to sales departments, operations staff and developers.

For SIers, PMs and DX leaders, a practical starting point is to clarify terms that directly affect data and processing before writing detailed specifications. Keep the glossary concise and name the person responsible for confirming each definition.

1. Choose terms that can change system behavior

You do not need a dictionary for the entire organization. Start with business entities, statuses, business dates and metrics within the upcoming development scope.

For each term, ask who uses it, where it appears on screens or reports, and which decisions would change under a different interpretation. If a “completion date” determines the reporting period for an order, confirm its definition before designing the filter.

2. Record business meaning alongside the translation

Each entry should include the Japanese term, the agreed Vietnamese or English wording, its definition within the project, an example and a named reviewer. Also identify concepts that are easily confused but must remain distinct.

For example, the ordering party, delivery recipient and paying party may be different organizations. Translating all three as “customer” hides distinctions that need attention in data design. Translators support clear expression; business owners confirm the meaning.

3. Test understanding with a concrete scenario

Hypothetical example: the Japanese team requests a “monthly sales” screen. Sales staff want the value of confirmed orders, while operations staff want the value of delivered goods. The Vietnamese team has not been told about this difference.

The teams consider an order confirmed this month but delivered next month: which report should include it? After discussion, they separate the two metrics, give them explicit names and document their inclusion rules. This is an example of defining internal reports, not accounting guidance on revenue recognition.

4. Keep unresolved terms visible and assign an owner

Do not turn a provisional interpretation into an agreed requirement. Mark unresolved terms, identify who needs to answer and record the desired decision date. Make clear which design work depends on the answer.

If other work needs to continue, document the assumption and where it applies. Once the meaning is confirmed, revisit the affected screens, reports and data fields before closing the question.

5. Maintain one shared reference

Keep the glossary somewhere both teams can access, with links from specifications, tasks and review notes. When a definition changes, record why, who confirmed it and what is affected.

During reviews, ask the development team to explain the term using a business example. A concrete explanation gives the business owner a way to check understanding beyond a simple “understood.”

Clarify requirements with TECHNEST from the start

TECHNEST brings years of experience serving the Japanese market, designing and developing business systems, modernizing legacy applications and collaborating with Japanese consulting partners.

If you are preparing a project, start with a workflow or report that is difficult to define consistently. Explore our outsourcing services or contact TECHNEST to discuss the scope and a suitable way of working together.